Home      Login


Supported Decision-Making: Pathway to More Rights or More Wrongs?  


Author:  Loree Cook-Daniels.


Source: Volume 18, Number 01, May/June 2015 , pp.5-7(3)




Victimization of the Elderly and Disabled

< previous article |next article > |return to table of contents

Abstract: 

Supported Decision-Making (SDM) is generating attention and advocates these days, but as Loree Cook-Daniels asserts in this thought-provoking review, SDM is not getting the careful scrutiny it should. The concept hit the world stage as part of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities. The National Resource Center for Supported Decision-Making calls SDM “the right we all have to make our own decisions and direct our own lives,” but Ms. Cook-Daniels concludes, after having read a great many reports and documents on SDM, that one of the explicit goals of SDM seems to be to diminish the use of substituted decision-making, also known as guardianship—and that what appears to be a positive-sounding rights approach may also bring changes that could chip away protections for the elderly and disabled, unless some previously ignored issues are addressed.

Keywords: Supported Decision-Making (SDM)

Affiliations:  1: FORGE.

Subscribers click here to open full text in PDF.
Non-subscribers click here to purchase this article. $15

< previous article |next article > |return to table of contents