Home      Login


In Defense of Preponderance: Reactions to the OCR “Dear Colleague” Letter  


Author:  Daniel Kast.


Source: Volume 12, Number 04, Summer 2011 , pp.73-79(7)




Campus Safety & Student Development

next article > |return to table of contents

Abstract: 

This article discusses a letter from Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and the response to it from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE). In an attempt to help institutions of higher education better assess and respond to allegations of sexual violence on their campuses, the Department of Education distributed this letter to clarify the role of faculty and administrators in maintaining an environment free from harassment and ensuring that “all students feel safe in their school, so that they have the opportunity to benefit fully from the school’s programs and services.” Responding to the OCR letter, FIRE expressed “deep concerns” over the “deleterious impact” OCR’s guidance will have on students’ due process rights. In particular, FIRE reserves its wrath for one sentence in the OCR letter: “Therefore, preponderance of the evidence is the appropriate standard for investigating allegations of sexual harassment or violence.” Here, Daniel Kast discusses why “preponderance of the evidence” is an acceptable standard.

Keywords: Office for Civil Rights (OCR); Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE); Title IX

Affiliations:  .

Subscribers click here to open full text in PDF.
Non-subscribers click here to purchase this article. $20

next article > |return to table of contents