Regulating Sex Offenders in the Web 2.0 Era, Part I
Author: Andrew J. Harris, Ph.D..
Source: Volume 13, Number 05, August/September 2012 , pp.65-69(5)
next article > |return to table of contents
Abstract:
Beyond the legal challenges, legislatively mandated bans on social network participation raise certain practical questions. Given what we know about Internet-facilitated sexual offending, its perpetrators, and its victims, are such bans likely to produce substantive improvements to the public safety? On the technological front, can any such laws adapt quickly enough to respond to the emergence of new modes of communication and the rapidly changing digital landscape?Keywords: Doe v. Jindal, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19841, Doe, et al. v. Nebraska, 734 F. Supp. 2d 882, 937, Doe v. Prosecutor of Marion County, 566 F. Supp. 2d 862, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48515, Doe v. City of Indianapolis, et al.
Affiliations:
1: University of Massachusetts Lowell.