Home      Login


Admissibility of Digital Evidence: Foundation Issues  


Author:  Roslyn  Myers, Esq..; Irene  Lee.


Source: Volume 08, Number 05, August/September 2007 , pp.-68(2)




Sex Offender Law Report

< previous article |next article > |return to table of contents

Abstract: 

It seems that no sooner has the justice system accepted DNA evidence, its analysis, and dependability than it is faced with the increasing necessity to accept a relatively new but equally dependable type of evidence at trial—digital evidence. (See, e.g., Office for Victims of Crime, "DNA: Critical Issues for Those Who Work With Victims," NCJ 211970 (2007) (presenting a series of interviews with crime victims, victim advocates, sexual assault nurse examiners, law enforcement, and prosecutors; addressing the collection and preservation of DNA evidence; and explaining how cold case investigations are handled) (available from the OVC Resource Center; (800) 851–3420; http://OVC.NCJRS.org/askovc).) Considering the roughly 200-year history of photography and its development, it has been an astonishingly short time since it's inception that digital photography became the preferred method of capturing images.

Keywords: 

Affiliations:  1: Fordham University; 2: Fordham University.

Subscribers click here to open full text in PDF.
Non-subscribers click here to purchase this article. $10

< previous article |next article > |return to table of contents