Home      Login


Developments in M&A Litigation  (Volume 52, Number 8–April 24, 2019)


Author:  Meredith Kotler.; Mark McDonald.


Source: Volume 52, Number 08, April 15 2019 , pp.85-96(12)




Review of Securities & Commodities Regulation

return to table of contents

Abstract: 

The authors begin their article by discussing three Delaware decisions that have largely brought an end to multi-jurisdictional M & A litigation, sharply limited Revlon-based preliminary injunctions, and disapproved most disclosure-only settlements. The result has been to shift most new M & A lawsuits to the federal courts, although these cases are almost always settled without litigation. The authors then turn to cases that continue to be litigated in Delaware state court, notably post-closing damages claims, cases involving controlling stockholders, books and records actions, and appraisal actions. They close by discussing examples of Delaware M & A litigation not brought by stockholder plaintiffs, namely “broken deal” litigation and the recent CBS/Redstone case.

Keywords: Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings LLC3; Boilermakers Local 154 Ret. Fund v. Chevron Corp.; C&J Energy Services, Inc. v. City of Miami General Employees’ & Sanitation Employees’ Retirement Trust; “Books and Records” Actions; “Appraisal Arbitr

Affiliations:  1: Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP; 2: Cleary Gottlieb.

Subscribers click here to open full text in PDF.
Non-subscribers click here to purchase this article. $99

return to table of contents