Home      Login

Abstract: 

The complete issue includes all of the articles listed in the contents above plus briefer treatments of Rosie D. v. Baker, 958 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2020), a class action brought on behalf of Medicaid-eligible children with serious emotional disturbances; Kruger v. Lashbrook, 2020 WL 951075 (S.D. Ill.), in which an inmate in Illinois Pontiac prison, brings a pro se complaint against Wexford Health Sources and multiple health care providers; a brief review of the opinion in The opinion in Balsewicz v. Pawlyk, 2020 WL 3481688 (7th Cir.), which begins, “When a prison official knows that an inmate faces a substantial risk of serious harm, the Eighth Amendment requires that official to take reasonable measures to abate the risk.” Simple, right to the point, and clearly protective of inmates who are intended victims of another inmate; People v. Frahs, 27 Cal. App. 5th 784 (2018), in which this intermediate state appeals court found that a trial court was required to make a determination whether plaintiff could be diverted after a felony conviction due to his serious mental illness; Parsons v. Shinn; Jackson v. Angus; Sawyers v. Norton; People v. Coty.

Keywords: Rasho v. Walker; Illinois Department of Corrections; Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections; Detainee Suicide; Seriously Mentally Ill

Affiliations:  1: Executive Editor.