No Private Right of Action for Retaliatory Firing Under Title IX
Author: Ken Kozlowski, JD.
Source: Volume 04, Number 03, January/February 2003 , pp.39-41(3)
< previous article |next article > |return to table of contents
Abstract:
Legislation and court cases dealing with campus issues involving a physical education teacher’s suit against a school for retaliatory firing (no private right of action for retaliatory firing under Title IX), a mother’s suit against a fraternity and sorority after her son’s alcohol related death (fraternity not liable for drunken driving death) , a suit determining whether a student with a scholarship is considered an employee of the university (student-athlete not considered an employee of a university).Keywords: Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ.; Alexander v. Sandoval; Cannon v. Univ. of Chicago; Estate of Vosnick v. RRJC, Inc.; Grayson Fraternal Order of Eagles, Aerie No. 3738 v. Claywell; Shephard v. Loyola Marymount Univ.; Van Horn v. Industrial Acc. Com
Affiliations:
1: University of Dayton School of Law.