From the Courts: Deliberate Indifference; Qualified Immunity; Hepatitis C; Eighth Amendment
Author: Ken Kozlowski.
Source: Volume 26, Number 04, Fall 2025 , pp.81-84(4)

< previous article |next article > |return to table of contents
Abstract:
Our regular review of important appellate decisions includes three cases: Tackett v. Dauss (7th Cir. 2025), where the court held that Indiana’s chief medical officer was not deliberately indifferent to an inmate’s fatal Hepatitis C because she was not personally involved in his care and had taken steps to expand access to antiviral treatment; Dantzler v. Baldwin (8th Cir. 2025), which denied qualified immunity to a prison doctor who delayed ordering an MRI for a serious knee injury based on the inmate’s possible parole, finding such a nonmedical delay could constitute deliberate indifference; and Erickson v. Gogebic County, Michigan (6th Cir. 2025), where a county officer was found liable for unconstitutional use of force but not for deliberate indifference to the inmate’s medical needs.Keywords: Deliberate Indifference; Qualified Immunity; Excessive Force; Prison Medical Care; Hepatitis C; Eighth Amendment
Affiliations:
1: Contributing Editor.