Home      Login


Harrington V. Purdue Pharma: An Opening Salvo on Third-Party Releases  


Author:  R. Stephen McNeill.


Source: Volume 40, Number 12, December 2024 , pp.121-127(7)




Review of Banking & Financial Services

next article > |return to table of contents

Abstract: 

Third-party releases in bankruptcy proceedings have existed for over 40 years with very little guidance from Congress or the Supreme Court regarding the permissibility of those releases. That changed with the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Purdue, where the Supreme Court ruled that non-consensual releases of non-debtors by other non-debtors are not permissible. That decision, however, left open a bevy of unresolved issues, many of which may need to be resolved by the Supreme Court in future decisions absent Congressional action in the interim. This article addresses many of those open issues and how lower courts have already begun to address them following the Supreme Court’s decision.

Keywords: Consensual Third-Party Releases; Full Satisfaction Releases; Substantially Consummated Plans

Affiliations:  1: Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP.

Subscribers click here to open full text in PDF.
Non-subscribers click here to purchase this article. $45

next article > |return to table of contents