From the Literature
Author: Erin Bundra, J.D..
Source: Volume 15, Number 02, February/March 2014 , pp.23-26(4)
< previous article |next article > |return to table of contents
Abstract:
Reviews two recent studies on college sexual assault and three studies on child safety and juvenile sex laws : “Sorority Women’s and Fraternity Men’s Rape Myth Acceptance and Bystander Intervention Attitudes” by R. Sean Bannon, Matthew W. Brosi, and John D. Foubert 50(1) J. Student Affairs Res. & Practice 72-87 (2013); “When Do Men Perceive That “No” Means “Yes”?: Effects of Alcohol and Men’s Expectancies of Intoxicated Women’s Sexual Desire and Vulnerability on Sexual Aggression” by Cameron A. Miller and Dominic J. Parrott Psychol. Dissertations, Paper 116 (2013); “Evaluation of Internet Child Safety Materials Used by ICAC Task Forces in School and Community Settings” by Lisa M. Jones, Ph.D., Kimberly J. Mitchell, Ph.D., and Wendy A. Walsh, Ph.D. NIJ Res. Rep. Digest (Nov. 2013); “Dating Abuse Prevention in Teens of Moms With Domestic Violence Protection Orders” by Vangie A. Foshee, Kim Dixon, Ling Yin-Chang, Susan Ennett, Beth Moracco, J. Michael Bowling, and Jennifer L. Moss Oct. 16, 2012; “Exploratory Study of Juvenile Orders of Protection as a Remedy for Dating Violence” by Andrew Klein, Ph.D., Amy Salomon, Ph.D., Laura Elwyn, Ph.D., Amy Barasch, Esq., Jane L. Powers, Ph.D., Mary Maley, M.S., James A. Gilmer, M.A., Matthew Pirchner, M.A., Ian Harris, Esq., Jennifer Sarah Tiffany, Ph.D., and Deinera Exner-Cortens NIJ Res. Rep. Digest (Nov. 2013)Keywords: Bystander Model; Rape Myths; Intervention Responsibility; Alcohol Myopia and Expectancy Theories
Affiliations:
1: Attorney at Law.