Home      Login


Testing the Story Model of Juror Decision-making  


Author:  Douglas D. Koski, JD, Ph.D.


Source: Volume 04, Number 04, June/July 2003 , pp.53-56(4)




Sex Offender Law Report

< previous article |next article > |return to table of contents

Abstract: 

This is the seventh article in an ongoing series based on Dr. Koski’s “Jury Decisionmaking in Rape Trials: A Review and Empirical Assessment,” which appears in its entirety in 38 (1)Criminal Law Bulletin 21 (Jan/Feb 2002), and is reprinted in SLR with the kind permission of the author and publisher. The article below details the study methodology and analytic design, including the demographics of the subjects. It sets forth the first of Koski’s four hypotheses of juror decisionmaking, which predicted that individual-level (predeliberation) not-guilty votes would be positively related to the victim’s failure to achieve legitimate victim status, as measured by prior relationship. The article analyzes jury outcomes based on this model.

Keywords: 

Affiliations:  1: Rutgers University School of Criminal Justice Distinguished Research Fellow.

Subscribers click here to open full text in PDF.
Non-subscribers click here to purchase this article. $15

< previous article |next article > |return to table of contents