Home      Login


Hazing: Response and Liability  


Author:  Ralph M. Gerstein.; Lois Gerstein .


Source: Volume 09, Number 04, Summer 2008 , pp.79-83(5)




Campus Safety & Student Development

< previous article |next article > |return to table of contents

Abstract: 

College administrators, quite understandably, take an interest in the activities of fraternities. Where hazing takes the form of physical or psychological abuse, or students legally or illegally (depending on age) are consuming alcohol at the behest of fraternity members, there are potential tort liability problems for universities as well as for local and national chapters of fraternities. Moreover, university disciplinary codes should contain anti-hazing provisions in order to deter students from the more serious kinds of hazing.

Keywords: Walker v. Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity; Carpetta v. Piu Kappa Alpha Fraternity; Coghlan v. Beta Theta Univ; Lloyd v. Alpha Phi Alpha; Knoll v. Bd. of Regents; Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity et al.;

Affiliations:  1: CSSD Editor; 2: CSSD Editor.

Subscribers click here to open full text in PDF.
Non-subscribers click here to purchase this article. $20

< previous article |next article > |return to table of contents