|
PARTIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part 1: The Doorway of the Juvenile Court
- Chapter 1: The Pioneering Vision of Judge Ben B. Lindsey, Denver’s
Juvenile Court Judge, 1901–27
- Chapter 2: The Constitutionalization of the Juvenile Court
Adjudicatory Process: The Case of Gerald Gault
- Chapter 3: Keep Them in Juvenile Court
- Chapter 4: Juvenile and Family Courts’ Increasing Role
in Child Abuse and Neglect Cases
- Chapter 5: The Other World of the Juvenile Court: Reforming
Child Abuse and Neglect Proceedings
- Chapter 6: Collaboration to Speed Court Process and Curb Foster
Care Drift in California
- Chapter 7: Revisiting Status Offenders
- Chapter 8: What Is a Juvenile Court? On the Function of the
Court as Disciplinarian for Non-Dangerous School
- Offenses
- Chapter 9: A Community Imperative: Curbing Minority Overrepresentation
in the Juvenile Justice System
- Chapter 10: Judges Encourage Greater Role for Crime Victims
in Juvenile Court
Part 2: The Handling of Offenders: The Legal Side
- Chapter 11: New Mexico’s Revised Children’s Code
- Chapter 12: North Carolina Enacts Major Juvenile Code Revisions:
All Delinquency Cases Continue to Be Initiate
- in Juvenile Court
- Chapter 13: The Juvenile Court Judge’s Role: Planting
Good Seeds
- Chapter 14: Prosecutors in Juvenile Court
- Chapter 15: The Role of Defense Attorneys in Juvenile Justice
Proceedings
- Chapter 16: Judges and Probation Officers: Improving the Working
Relationship
Part 3: The Handling of Offenders: Apprehension
Through Disposition
- Chapter 17: Dejailing and Rejailing Juveniles
- Chapter 18: Reflections on Pretrial Detention
- Chapter 19: The Ins and Outs of Detention: Sacramento Addresses
Detention Center Overcrowding
- Chapter 20: Diversion to the Community: Neighborhood Accountability
Boards in Santa Clara County, California
- Chapter 21: Improving Juvenile Delinquent Case Flow
- Chapter 22: Thoughts on Improving Juvenile Court Dispositions
Part 4: Community Intervention Programs
- Chapter 23: Transformation: A New Start for Juvenile Probation
in Atlanta
- Chapter 24: School-Based Probation Officers in Pittsburgh:
A New and Different School-Juvenile Court Partnership
- Chapter 25: A New Probation Opry in Nashville: Decentralization
Strikes a Positive Chord
- Chapter 26: Dakota County, Minnesota: Repairing Harm and Holding
Juveniles Accountable
- Chapter 27: Let’s Do More With Monetary Restitution and
Community Work Service
- Chapter 28: Youth Restitution Program: Achieving Juvenile Accountability
in Madison, Wisconsin
- Chapter 29: Work Crews Working: Montana Project Uses Community
Service to Build Skills
- Chapter 30: Youth Passages: Enriched Community-Based Intervention
With High-Risk, Mid-Range Offenders
- Chapter 31: How Santa Cruz County’s GROW Program Uses
Interdisciplinary Teams to Curb Out-of-Home
- Placements
- Chapter 32: IMPACTing Detention and Commitment: Multi-Agency
Collaboration Serves Juveniles With Multi
- System Needs in Boulder County, Colorado
- Chapter 33: Zero Commitments to the State: The Commitment to
Community-Based Intervention in Delaware County, Ohio
Part 5: Beyond the Community: State Institutions
and Aftercare
- Chapter 34: Teen Quest: Female-Specific Program Services for
Colorado’s Delinquent Girls
- Chapter 35: Tallulah: Lessons From Louisiana
- Chapter 36: Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Moves Forward
by Moving Back to the Community
- Chapter 37: RECLAIM Ohio: Funding Formula Bolsters Development
of Community-Based Alternatives While
- Reducing Commitments to the State
- Chapter 38: Taking More Care With Juvenile Aftercare
Part 6: The Juvenile Court of the Future
- Chapter 39: Should Juvenile Courts Become Family Courts?
- Chapter 40: The Future of the Juvenile Court
- Chapter 41: Getting Serious About the Coordination of Family-Related
Cases: Family Court Operation in Bend, Oregon
Part 7: Juvenile Justice in Other Worlds
- Chapter 42: Visiting Native American Juvenile Justice
- Chapter 43: Peacemaking: From Conflict to Harmony in the Navajo
Tradition
- Chapter 44: El Salvador Initiates a Juvenile Court
Postscript
| 
